chinesepornvideos.net, germanpornhd.net, hentaipornhd.net, incestpornxxx.com, indianporntube.org, italianpornhd.net, koreanpornhd.net, maturepornhd.net, milfpornhd.net, pornoregno.com, swingers-porn.net, thaipornhd.net

New Socialist Webzine

Indigenous Feminism Without Apology

By Andrea Smith


"...Allegiance to 'America' or 'Canada' legitimizes the genocide and colonization of Native peoples upon which these nation-states are founded. By making anti-colonial struggle central to feminist politics, Native women place in question the appropriate form of governance for the world in general." Andrea Smith, New Socialist, 2006


In the fall of 2012, four women - Sylvia McAdam, Sheelah McLean, Jessica Gordon, and Nina Wilson, began discussing the implications of the Harper government's omnibus Bill C-45 for Indigenous rights and the environment. That discussion gave rise to an "Idle No More" Facebook page, followed by teach-ins and rallies in Saskatoon and Regina in November. A national solidarity day on December 10 was the catalyst for a movement that spread across the continent and provoked international expressions of solidarity. Chief Theresa Spence of Attawapiskat First Nation declared a hunger strike the following day, further raising the profile of the movement.

The leading role played by Indigenous women in the Idle No More movement reflects both their positioning as victims of colonial violence and oppression in Canada - and the power that they maintain within their communities. The ongoing reality of gender violence was brutally exemplified on December 27 when "Angela Smith" was sexually assaulted in Thunder Bay while being told that Indians didn't deserve treaty rights.

Sympathetic analysts of the Idle No More movement often refer to Cherokee writer and activist Andrea Smith's works as resources for activists. In the book Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide (2005) Smith places women of colour, and specifically Indigenous women, at the center of analysis (see the book review in New Socialist magazine). A year later, Smith contributed an article on the politics of indigenous feminism to the special Indigenous Resurgence issue of the New Socialist magazine. The following is a reprint of that article, still very relevant today. - New Socialist webzine editors

We often hear the mantra in indigenous communities that Native women aren't feminists. Supposedly, feminism is not needed because Native women were treated with respect prior to colonization. Thus, any Native woman who calls herself a feminist is often condemned as being "white."

However, when I started interviewing Native women organizers as part of a research project, I was surprised by how many community-based activists were describing themselves as "feminists without apology." They were arguing that feminism is actually an indigenous concept that has been co-opted by white women.

The fact that Native societies were egalitarian 500 years ago is not stopping women from being hit or abused now. For instance, in my years of anti-violence organizing, I would hear, "We can't worry about domestic violence; we must worry about survival issues first." But since Native women are the women most likely to be killed by domestic violence, they are clearly not surviving. So when we talk about survival of our nations, who are we including?

These Native feminists are challenging not only patriarchy within Native communities, but also white supremacy and colonialism within mainstream white feminism. That is, they're challenging why it is that white women get to define what feminism is.

Decentering White Feminism

The feminist movement is generally periodized into the so-called first, second and third waves of feminism. In the United States, the first wave is characterized by the suffragette movement; the second wave is characterized by the formation of the National Organization for Women, abortion rights politics, and the fight for the Equal Rights Amendments. Suddenly, during the third wave of feminism, women of colour make an appearance to transform feminism into a multicultural movement.

This periodization situates white middle-class women as the central historical agents to which women of colour attach themselves. However, if we were to recognize the agency of indigenous women in an account of feminist history, we might begin with 1492 when Native women collectively resisted colonization. This would allow us to see that there are multiple feminist histories emerging from multiple communities of colour which intersect at points and diverge in others. This would not negate the contributions made by white feminists, but would de-center them from our historicizing and analysis.

Indigenous feminism thus centers anti-colonial practice within its organizing. This is critical today when you have mainstream feminist groups supporting, for example, the US bombing of Afghanistan with the claim that this bombing will free women from the Taliban (apparently bombing women somehow liberates them).

Challenging The State

Indigenous feminists are also challenging how we conceptualize indigenous sovereignty - it is not an add-on to the heteronormative and patriarchal nation-state. Rather it challenges the nation-state system itself.

Charles Colson, prominent Christian Right activist and founder of Prison Fellowship, explains quite clearly the relationship between heteronormativity and the nation-state. In his view, same-sex marriage leads directly to terrorism; the attack on the "natural moral order" of the heterosexual family "is like handing moral weapons of mass destruction to those who use America's decadence to recruit more snipers and hijackers and suicide bombers."

Similarly, the Christian Right World magazine opined that feminism contributed to the Abu Ghraib scandal by promoting women in the military. When women do not know their assigned role in the gender hierarchy, they become disoriented and abuse prisoners.

Implicit in this is analysis the understanding that heteropatriarchy is essential for the building of US empire. Patriarchy is the logic that naturalizes social hierarchy. Just as men are supposed to naturally dominate women on the basis of biology, so too should the social elites of a society naturally rule everyone else through a nation-state form of governance that is constructed through domination, violence, and control.

As Ann Burlein argues in Lift High the Cross, it may be a mistake to argue that the goal of Christian Right politics is to create a theocracy in the US. Rather, Christian Right politics work through the private family (which is coded as white, patriarchal, and middle-class) to create a "Christian America." She notes that the investment in the private family makes it difficult for people to invest in more public forms of social connection.

For example, more investment in the suburban private family means less funding for urban areas and Native reservations. The resulting social decay is then construed to be caused by deviance from the Christian family ideal rather than political and economic forces. As former head of the Christian Coalition Ralph Reed states: "The only true solution to crime is to restore the family," and "Family break-up causes poverty."

Unfortunately, as Navajo feminist scholar Jennifer Denetdale points out, the Native response to a heteronormative white, Christian America has often been an equally heteronormative Native nationalism. In her critique of the Navajo tribal council's passage of a ban on same-sex marriage, Denetdale argues that Native nations are furthering a Christian Right agenda in the name of "Indian tradition." This trend is equally apparent within racial justice struggles in other communities of colour. As Cathy Cohen contends, heteronormative sovereignty or racial justice struggles will effectively maintain rather than challenge colonialism and white supremacy because they are premised on a politics of secondary marginalization. The most elite class will further their aspirations on the backs of those most marginalized within the community.

Through this process of secondary marginalization, the national or racial justice struggle either implicitly or explicitly takes on a nation-state model as the end point of its struggle - a model in which the elites govern the rest through violence and domination, and exclude those who are not members of "the nation."

National Liberation

Grassroots Native women, along with Native scholars such as Taiaiake Alfred and Craig Womack, are developing other models of nationhood. These articulations counter the frequent accusations that nation-building projects necessarily lead to a narrow identity politics based on ethnic cleansing and intolerance. This requires that a clear distinction be drawn between the project of national liberation, and that of nation-state building.

Progressive activists and scholars, while prepared to make critiques of the US and Canadian governments, are often not prepared to question their legitimacy. A case in point is the strategy of many racial justice organizations in the US or Canada, who have rallied against the increase in hate crimes since 9/11 under the banner, "We're American [or Canadian] too."

This allegiance to "America" or "Canada" legitimizes the genocide and colonization of Native peoples upon which these nation-states are founded. By making anti-colonial struggle central to feminist politics, Native women place in question the appropriate form of governance for the world in general.

In questioning the nation-state, we can begin to imagine a world that we would actually want to live in. Such a political project is particularly important for colonized peoples seeking national liberation outside the nation-state.

Whereas nation-states are governed through domination and coercion, indigenous sovereignty and nationhood is predicated on interrelatedness and responsibility.

As Sharon Venne explains, "Our spirituality and our responsibilities define our duties. We understand the concept of sovereignty as woven through a fabric that encompasses our spirituality and responsibility. This is a cyclical view of sovereignty, incorporating it into our traditional philosophy and view of our responsibilities. It differs greatly from the concept of Western sovereignty which is based upon absolute power. For us absolute power is in the Creator and the natural order of all living things; not only in human beings... Our sovereignty is related to our connections to the earth and is inherent."

Revolution

A Native feminist politics seeks to do more than simply elevate Native women's status - it seeks to transform the world through indigenous forms of governance that can be beneficial to everyone.

At the 2005 World Liberation Theology Forum held in Porto Alegre, Brazil, indigenous peoples from Bolivia stated that they know another world is possible because they see that world whenever they do their ceremonies. Native ceremonies can be a place where the present, past and future become co-present. This is what Native Hawaiian scholar Manu Meyer calls a racial remembering of the future.

Prior to colonization, Native communities were not structured on the basis of hierarchy, oppression or patriarchy. We will not recreate these communities as they existed prior to colonization. Our understanding that a society without structures of oppression was possible in the past tells us that our current political and economic system is anything but natural and inevitable. If we lived differently before, we can live differently in the future.

Native feminism is not simply an insular or exclusivist "identity politics" as it is often accused of being. Rather, it is framework that understands indigenous women's struggle as part of a global movement for liberation. As one activist stated: "You can't win a revolution on your own. And we are about nothing short of a revolution. Anything else is simply not worth our time."

Andrea Smith is a Cherokee activist and scholar. She is author of co-founder of Incite! Women of Color Against Violence, the Boarding School Healing Project, and Chicago chapter of Women of All Red Nations. She teaches Media and Cultural Studies at University of California, Riverside.

Comments   

 
0 #3 JytteNhanenge 2013-10-28 11:15
Thank you for an excellent article Andrea Smith. Thanks for forwarding Richard Zane Smith; I agree with your and David Jordan’s comments. We need to restore a dynamic tension between the masculine and feminine energies in order to create balance in the current masculine dominated, reductionist, and patriarchal world-view. If the current patriarchal values continue unabated, it will end in global holocaust. Thus, we must indeed initiate a peaceful revolution to end Patriarchy and develop a holistic world-view that includes both masculine and feminine energies. Only then can we create harmony and a quality of life for society and nature worldwide.

This is a struggle not only for native people; we are all in this together, men as well as women. However, indigenous people have essential wisdom to share with those of us who only have experienced "modern" values.

For more on this subject please do visit http://www.intsangano.com/
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 David M. Jordan 2013-10-25 14:44
I usually refrain from committing myself on political issues but I have a feeling that the rectification of the imbalance in the Earth’s structure is dependent upon the non-repression of women and the revival of ethnic cultures. Just a thought.
Maybe, men need rescuing from themselves.
Quote
 
 
+2 #1 Richard Zane Smith 2013-10-24 04:42
Incredibly clear words of deep wisdom.
Not only brilliant insights into problems within patriarchal systems, but also offers a road map out of this mess.
Should be required reading...of the planet.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh


porno pornosmp4 pornoArea Porno HD PORNO LINA