New Socialist : Blog

"The incredible economic leverage of First Nations today"

"News reports are ablaze with reports of looming Indigenous blockades and economic disruption. As the Idle No More movement explodes into a new territory of political action, it bears to amplify the incredible economic leverage of First Nations today, and how frightened the government and industry are of their capacity to wield it." Read Shiri Pasternak's article "The Economics of Insurgency" here.

Injured Workers and the Austerity Agenda in Ontario

By Bruce Allen

Injured workers, their plight and their issues are rarely if ever considered in relationship to the global austerity agenda and the ongoing fight against it. Yet what is happening in Ontario reveals there is compelling reason why they should be.

An analysis of what is happening at the WSIB in Ontario lays bare the obvious fact that the trajectory of the changes being made at the WSIB to the overwhelming disadvantage of injured workers parallel the trajectory of the austerity agenda involving a process in which wealth is systematically, brazenly being redistributed away from labour and into the pockets of those who own and control capital.

So how is this evident in Ontario’s workers compensation system? It is personified in a former bank executive named David Marshall who was hired by Ontario’s Liberal government to eradicate the WSIB’s so called unfunded liability; the projected gap between revenue going into the WSIB from employer premiums paid into the system and the projected benefits to be paid out to injured workers by the WSIB. Significantly this gap was caused by major cuts to the premiums employers pay into the system. Yet Marshall’s mandate is not to eliminate the gap by adjusting employer premiums upward but by instituting a multitude of measures slashing the various benefits paid out to injured workers. I effect injured workers are being made to bear the burden of a crisis created by concerted government efforts over the past two decades to line employers’ pockets by slashing the WSIB premiums they pay. This exemplifies wealth redistribution in line with the austerity agenda

The logical result is a more lucrative business climate for employers causing declining living standards for injured workers and more widespread poverty among them as well as cuts in WSIB costs via intensified efforts to get injured workers off of benefits and back to work with less and less regard for injured workers’ physical wellbeing particularly by employers.

One could go on at length with examples of how this is unfolding. It is sufficient to limit onself to touching on one pivotal example. Namely the dwindling compensation paid to injured workers for permanent injuries.

Workers have gone from having a pre-1990 system of pensions for life to compensate for injuries for life to a very inferior system of Non Economic Loss (NEL) awards worth only a fraction of what the pre-1990 pensions were worth and from there to WSIB Operational Policy changes making it harder to get NEL awards and now to policies making it much harder to get increases in those awards to compensate for significant deterioration in the condition of permanent injuries and finally to unprecedented efforts to reduce the size and cost of NEL awards ostensibly by taking into account non-occupational age related changes in our bodies regardless of whether they were a health problem prior to an injury or not.

Simply stated these changes slash the costs of compensating workers’ for permanent injuries in order to help resolve the fraudulent funding crisis of the compensation system caused by government efforts to cut employer WSIB premiums.

To sum up the obvious implication of this one example of wealth redistribution towards Capital is that the fight for just compensation for injured workers must be more than integral to the fight against the austerity agenda. It must be front and centre in that fight. In waging it we clearly must fight to win.

Idle No More: more must-reads

Glen Coulthard's "Idle No More in Historical Context" is just one of the recent pieces worth reading on the Decolonization blog.

Harsha Walia takes on some of the racist ideas (expressed by journalist Christie Blatchford and many others) that act as obstacles to understanding that Canada is a colonial-settler state here.

Idle No More!

"Canada's placid winter surface has been broken by unprecedented protests by its aboriginal peoples. In just a few weeks, a small campaign launched against the Conservative government's budget bill by four aboriginal women has expanded and transformed into a season of discontent: a cultural and political resurgence." Read the rest of Martin Lukacs' very good piece here.

On how Idle No More started, check out this article. Its main website is IdleNoMore.ca

What would it take to begin to do away with the oppression of indigenous people in Canada? This leaflet (easy to print and distribute!) points to five radical reforms. As people mobilize to demand such changes, we also need to discuss the question of strategy: what it would take to implement them?

Monsters of the Market: An interview with David McNally

David McNally speaks to Ali Mustafa about his award-winning book Monsters of the Market: Zombies, Vampires, and Global Capitalism

You can find the interview here.

Stop a New Israeli Massacre in Gaza: Boycott Israel Now!

Read the call to people around the world in this new statement from the Palestinian BDS National Committee.

Remembrance Day: challenging the right

The Tory government is working hard to propagate views of history that fit with its agenda of austerity and militarism today, so for Nov. 11 here are a selection of articles that challenge the Tories' use of Nov. 11 and right-wing interpretations of World Wars I and II:

The misuse of November 11: How the Harper government exploits Remembrance Day

A letter from a British socialist student on why he declined to lay a wreath at his university's Remembrance Day service (about WW I)

Their war and ours: the people and the Second World War

Campaigning against the China-Canada investment pact

"The campaign against Canada-China FIPA is being promoted as if though Canada is being “sold,” is “selling out,” or is “for sale,” with the implication that only China will benefit from this agreement but Canada will not. The reality is that the Canadian state and corporations, as well as the Chinese state and its corporations, both benefit from this agreement.... We need an alternative approach to the current anti-FIPA campaign." Harjap Grewal's article opens a discussion on such an approach -- read it here.

The Venezuelan elections

Jeff Webber writes, "Chávez’s victory straightforwardly represents a stinging blow to the domestic right, represented through their candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski, and a setback for the interests of the United States in the region, a region which has – in no small part due to the ascendancy of Chávez, and the oil power he exercises – established a new relative autonomy from its Northern neighbour since the late 1990s." Read the rest of Jeff's article here.

The 2012 Toronto Palestine Film Festival: A Preview

"The 2012 Toronto Palestine Film Festival (TPFF) is finally set to hit theatres this weekend. Launched in 2008 to commemorate the 60th anniversary of al nakba, TPFF aims to showcase the vibrant cultural heritage, resilience, and collective identity of the Palestinian people through film, art, and other events." Read the rest of Ali Mustafa's article here.

Auto Concessions Signal Need For A Sharp Left Turn

By Bruce Allen

Three years ago General Motors and Chrysler workers made massive contract concessions. In fact, GM workers experienced two rounds of concessions bargaining in less than a year, the Harper government enforcing even greater roll backs than GM said it needed. Following that enormous, historic defeat the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) leadership loudly but unconvincingly assured their members that we would fight again another day.

Three years later "another day" has come and gone, without a fight and with more concessions at GM, Ford and Chrysler. The latest concessions are unprecedented, particularly with respect to new hires.

The CAW long denounced the two-tier wage agreements accepted by the UAW in the U.S.A. Now the CAW has all but completely acquiesced to that type of arrangement. New hires will be paid approximately $14.00 per hour less than regular workers. It will take them 10 years to attain the full rate, which will remain virtually unchanged for many years to come - plus it will take a full six years just to reach 70 per cent of the full rate. Worse, new hires will see deductions from their wages go towards the cost of their pensions, which will be seriously inferior to those available to current employees, while current employees experience no wage deductions going towards their pensions. In effect, the CAW has accepted a blatant system of two-tier pensions. New hires will also get much less vacation time.

All of this will result in a windfall of additional profits for the Detroit 3 auto corporations' Canadian operations, and it will accelerate the general decline of living standards for industrial workers in Canada. The time when autoworkers led the way in raising the living standards for industrial workers in Canada are long gone. Now they are leading the way downwards. And the CAW is functioning like a conduit for Capital's onslaught against labour.

Current active employees at the Detroit 3 in Canada will share in the pain of these long term collective agreements - in force until 2016. There are no wage increases at all. There will only be one cost of living increase - in the last quarter. Built-in COLA is replaced by lump sum payments cynically timed to be paid just before Christmas when autoworkers used to get a seasonal bonus. Simply stated, this means autoworkers will experience a steady decline in real income over the next four years. So will retired autoworkers. They have already been stripped of COLA on their pensions and they suffer a very inferior two-tier benefit package which is eroding.

None of this has been justified by declarations that new product investment has been acquired. There are no new products to be built in Canadian auto plants. Now the sorry, but all too familiar refrain is that we are living in tough times, faced with policies from hostile governments, including a high dollar. These excuses simply signal that there is no reason to expect anything but more of the same even with the aproaching CAW - CEP merger, with very serious consequences for labour as a whole, particularly in terms of living standards. No one is proclaiming we will 'fight again another day'.

A very bleak future lies ahead, unless we see the emergence of a rank and file based left opposition to the current leadership - a class conscious movement which recognizes that calling a halt to the ongoing retreat is imperative to keep us from going from very bad to even worse.

What does the CAW-CEP merger mean?

"At a time where the Canadian union movement is at a strategic impasse and a steep organizational decline, the new union they will form is being touted as a key element in turning the situation around, through a larger project of union renewal and a major response to the attacks on the working-class and labour movement," writes Herman Rosenfeld. Read his analysis of the merger here.

Learning from the Chicago teachers' strike

"This strike pushed the boundaries of contract unionism and took a moment in which the teachers union in Chicago was battling concessions and a mayor, Rahm Emanuel, who was intent on further eroding the power of the union and advancing a billionaire backed “education reform” agenda even further and turned it into a movement to fight for an improved education system and more broadly to fight for a city that puts people ahead of profit. It has been a long time since people have seen a union, in the public or the private sector, use the most powerful weapon in the arsenal of labour, the strike, to fight back... The biggest lesson for labour, especially public sector unions, is that reaching out to the public for support is all well and good but really winning their support requires that you make your struggle their struggle by fighting on broader class and antiracist terms."

Read Peter Brogan's article about the Chicago teachers' strike here.

Teachers strike in Chicago: a crucial battle

The Chicago Teachers' Union strike that began Sept. 10 could have a big impact -- read about it in this article in Labor Notes and check out this piece from a teacher's blog.

Understanding capitalism -- a video series worth watching

Check out Kapitalism101 for an ongoing series of videos that aim to introduce people to Marx's analysis of capitalism in a way that tries to be both accessible and serious about sometimes-challenging concepts needed to understand what goes on beneath the surface of everyday life in capitalist societies.

Some of what we'll be publishing in August

Coming soon in New Socialist Webzine: more articles on different aspects of the ongoing student/popular movement in Quebec (now heading into a difficult new phase of the struggle), a review of David Gilbert's book Love and Struggle by Kim Moody, and more

Uranium mining debate in Nunavut

"A conflict over a uranium mine in the far north, four decades in the making, has pitted members of a small Inuit community against their territorial government and a French company." Read Warren Bernauer's article in The Dominion.

Syria - scrambling to keep up

By Ken Hiebert

I am riveted by the news from Syria. From a great many sources. I also participate in heated on-line debates about what is happening there. I know that whatever I write will be out-of-date within days or even hours.

What in fact is happening? I'll tell you what I see.
There is a mass movement in Syria to overthrow the Assad regime. Does this include everyone? No, Assad still has some pockets of support. Some in the religious minorities fear the rule of a Sunni Muslim majority. And some people (Alawite, Christian and Sunni) have prospered under the Assad regime. In response to this, important voices have been raised within the revolt pledging a Syria for all Syrians. But the fear is still there. And the more that people are slaughtered by the government forces, the more that some people fear the anger that is bound to follow.
Is there outside influence in Syria? I am sure there is. Syrians desperate to defend themselves from government attack turn wherever they can to get assistance, including arms. Outside forces such as the US have urged the opposition to "unite." What they really mean is that the grass roots organization should submit to the leadership of the most moderate, pro-western forces.
The U.S. has a great capacity to grant material aid and to withhold it. See this article in The Telegraph.
Will the U. S. and NATO get directly involved? It could certainly happen. One indication of this is that Henry Kissinger decided to write an op-ed piece about this. If he didn't think it was possible, why would he bother? He's in a good position to know what is being debated within the American ruling class.
Also interesting is the stance taken by Daniel Pipes. He is not as close to the American ruling class as Kissinger, but he is in a position to know what the debates are. And he is one of the leading apologists in the U. S. for Israel. He would know what leading Israelis are thinking. And it is clear that whatever their dislike for Assad, they prefer him to what might come after him.
There is nothing new in this. They made it clear that they hoped that Mubarak would stay in power in Egypt. They were sorry to see him go. (In Canada, that's why Harper was so glum when Mubarak was defeated. All he could say was, "The toothpaste is out of the tube.")
Sources of information
This is a long list but still only a part of what you can find. The first four are the only ones I can recommend to you. You will decide which ones you have confidence in.
There is this website, New Socialist. Search for Syria and you'll come up with lots of useful information and analysis
IV is good, but there is nothing current there. You'll have to search the site.
Scroll down to July 11th.
For those who can read French
This site is in Arabic and English. Some for and some against Assad.
News feeds
Wikileaks
From Cuba
From Venezuela. For those who can read Spanish.
And the there are what I call the Hear No Evil, See No Evil sites. In private conversation they might admit that there is mass opposition to Assad,but in public they pretend they cannot see the mass movement inside Syria.
In another category is the Canadian Peace Alliance. This is a serious cross-country peace coalition. In fact it's the only such coalition. I took a blast at them on this site. (I failed to make my intentions clear and the item appeared under a pseudonym.) http://www.newsocialist.org/index.php/blog/623-an-entirely-wretched-statement
To be fair, while they couldn't bring themselves to criticize Assad in their statement they did provide a link to an article by Phyllis Bennis that was quite explicit in denouncing the crimes of the Assad regime. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/06/201262475838515783.html
It is also worth noting that if you go to the current home page of the CPA, you will not find any mention of this statement. http://www.acp-cpa.ca/en/
But there is something that the CPA has in common with the Hear No Evil sites. Neither the CPA or any of these other sites has asked me for money so they can send a fact finding commission to Syria. Imagine the impact it could have if we had Canadians in Syria who could challenge the news accounts we are receiving. What if CNN reported that a particular town was being shelled and we could say, "That's not true. We have someone in that town right now and they tell us there is no shelling."
There is a good reason why none of these organizations is going to Syria. They know that the facts on the ground would not fit into their truth
There are some outright pro-Assad sites. Here are two that I have found.
http://www.youtube.com/user/SyrianGirlpartisan (I thought this was from Syria, but I am told that she is in Dubai.)
And a couple of live feeds

Understanding the Tea Party in order to better fight the hard right

As the US presidential election draws closer and some right-wing Canadian politicians like Ontario Tory leader Tim Hudak, inspired by the defeat inflicted on unions in Wisconsin by hard-line Republicans, ratchet up the attack on union rights, we're sure to hear more about the Tea Party. Read Charlie Post's analysis of what it is and how to fight it here.

The future of Greece and SYRIZA

"Syriza now finds itself in an ambiguous position. Having come close to forming a left government, the pressure will be on to establish its credentials with international lenders and EU leaders... What happens to Syriza, whether and how it governs, will have a huge impact on the European left, and not just on Greece." Read the article by Richard Seymour here.

Why strike support isn't enough

"We want to share these lessons because any forceful fight against austerity in Canada will require a strategy that brings together public-sector workers and people who access public services. These two overlapping groups are the vast majority of Canadians and include many people who will need to be won over to the politics of solidarity in the face of the right’s attempts to divide."

Read the whole of the useful article "Why strike support isn't enough" by Halifax community organizers David Bush and Kaley Kennedy in Briarpatch.

An entirely wretched statement

On June 26 the Canadian Peace Alliance issued a statement on Syria. The statement gets off to a bad start from its very first words. The statement is titled No Western Intervention in Syria. But the second sentence says, "The Canadian Peace Alliance stands against any intervention from outside powers..." Well, which is it? Wouldn't "outside powers" refer to Russia as well? There have been some reports of the presence of Iranian forces in Syria. If these reports turn out to be true, would Iran be one of the "outside powers?"

What is happening in Syria? Here's what the CPA has to say:
"Moreover, Western governments are the loudest complainers when the Syrian government responds to armed aggression with force, as any other government would do in its place." A reasonable person might conclude the CPA believes that Assad has been falsely accused of attacking his own people. Of course, if this is what they believe, they have the right to say so. I would go farther and say that they have the obligation to say so, clearly and explicitly.
Perhaps they are uncertain. While they are researching the question, may I suggest that they read the article by Phyllis Bennis that they themselves provide the link for, "Syria: Only diplomacy can stop the war."
Here are a few quotes from her article:
"Despite his government's history of brutal repression, Bashar al-Assad still enjoys support..."
"Certainly the regime has committed brutal atrocities against civilians, potentially including war crimes..."
"The regime is clearly responsible for more attacks with heavy weapons, including tanks and artillery..."
Reading what they have to say about the United Nations you might not guess they we in the anti-war movement have sometimes had reason to criticize the UN.
The CPA calls for "...a diplomatic solution to the Syrian crisis" This is not what the Syrian people are calling for. At the risk of their lives they are going into the streets to demand the end of the Assad regime. The CPA does not express any solidarity with Syrians or even acknowledge the existence of their movement.
In the midst of their statement they say something that we can all agree to. "Western governments have always had their own interests at heart while engaging in these types of interventions." This would be a good starting point for a useful statement on Syria. But, to be effective, any statement on Syria must not have even a whiff of support for the Assad regime.
Not only is it possible to link our opposition to Canadian intervention to support for the Syrian people. It is necessary to do that.

Canada Day

"It would be strange indeed to celebrate the birth of a nation that stole my land, forced hardships on my peoples and won’t recognize my place in this nation or all that my ancestors lost and sacrificed for this home on my native land." Read the rest of Susana Deranger's article in Briarpatch here.

Disability politics and capitalism in crisis

"What governments are actually saying to disabled people is unless they work for a living or seek the support of their family, they will die—period. What right-wing governments are seeking to do is to return industrialized societies to the Victorian, neo-classical values of individual choice, responsibility, and self-reliance. This means that disabled people and other excluded groups will have to increasingly (if they are unemployed or underemployed) rely on charity or the family for survival, as the State will no longer provide anything more than temporary support." Read the rest of Chris J Ford's article in the latest issue of New Politics.

Overhauled website

We've updated our website and look forward to being able to provide readers with more than just text. The only casualties of the transition were blog posts of the last few months and comments previously posted on articles on the site, but we hope readers will continue to comment on what you read on the site. If you encounter any technical issues with the site, please let us know by e-mail at website [at] newsocialist.org