ÿþ<htmlÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<headÿþ>ÿþ<script type="text/javascript" src="https://web-static.archive.org/_static/js/bundle-playback.js?v=2N_sDSC0" charset="utf-8"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://web-static.archive.org/_static/js/wombat.js?v=txqj7nKC" charset="utf-8"></script>ÿþ ÿþ<script>window.RufflePlayer=window.RufflePlayer||{};window.RufflePlayer.config={"autoplay":"on","unmuteOverlay":"hidden","showSwfDownload":true};</script> <script type="text/javascript" src="ÿþhttps://web-static.archive.org/_static/ÿþjs/ruffle/ruffle.js"></script> ÿþ<script type="text/javascript"> ÿþ __wm.init(ÿþ"https://web.archive.org/web"ÿþ); __wm.wombat(ÿþ"http://www.newsocialist.org/old_mag/magazine/20/article01.html"ÿþ,ÿþ"20100626203841"ÿþ,ÿþ"https://web.archive.org/"ÿþ,ÿþ"web"ÿþ,ÿþ"https://web-static.archive.org/_static/"ÿþ, "ÿþ1277584721ÿþ"); </script> ÿþ<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://web-static.archive.org/_static/css/banner-styles.css?v=1utQkbB3" /> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://web-static.archive.org/_static/css/iconochive.css?v=3PDvdIFv" />ÿþ ÿþ<!-- End Wayback Rewrite JS Include --> ÿþ ÿþ<titleÿþ>ÿþNew Socialist Magazine, Harris - The Sequel: Ontario Tories' Second Term - Articleÿþ</title>ÿþ ÿþ<metaÿþ ÿþname="description"ÿþ ÿþcontent="New Socialist Group socialism communism socialists communists "ÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<metaÿþ ÿþname="keywords"ÿþ ÿþcontent="socialism, communism, socialists, communists, marx, marxists, marxism, Marx, Marxists, Marxism, Canada, politics, anarchism, Trotsky, trotskyism, NDP, radical, revolution, revolutionary, Lenin, leninism, leninist, Luxemburg, working class, 1917, syndicalism, radicalism, union, labour, anarchy"ÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ</head>ÿþ ÿþ<bodyÿþ ÿþtopmargin="20"ÿþ ÿþleftmargin="20"ÿþ ÿþmarginheight="20"ÿþ ÿþmarginwidth="20"ÿþ ÿþbgcolor="#FFFFFF"ÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<fontÿþ ÿþface="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"ÿþ ÿþsize="5"ÿþ ÿþcolor="#000000"ÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<centerÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<bÿþ>ÿþHarris - The Sequel ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþOntario Tories' Second Term ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ</b>ÿþ</font>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<fontÿþ ÿþface="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"ÿþ ÿþsize="2"ÿþ ÿþcolor="#000000"ÿþ>ÿþ by Alan Searsÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<iÿþ>ÿþNew Socialist Magazine, July - August 1999ÿþ</i>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ</center>ÿþ He's back! If you hated the first term you're going to hate the sequel even more. Just look at their promises - deep cuts to fund a further 20% tax reduction that will mainly benefit the rich, drug tests and other forms of harassment for people receiving social assistance, new anti-union laws, school uniforms and more standardized tests for students and teachers (but, to paraphrase Marx, who will test the tester?). The list could go on.... ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ But it is worse than that. At least in the first term there was a significant fight back, including the 1996 OPSEU strike, one day strikes (called Days of Action) that shut down a number of cities, the two-week general strike by teachers in 1997 and lots of other actions. These mobilizations gave Harris fighters (the real ones, not Howard Hampton and the NDP, who pushed for an electoral focus) the sense that it was possible to do something. Further, they created a space for the left to challenge the Tories' agenda. Harris' popularity reached its lowest point just after the teachers' strike. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ It is very unlikely that we are going to see fightbacks on that scale in the sequel. There is going to be a lot more resignation. Calls for protests are quite likely to receive a cynical "been there, done that" dismissal in the immediate future. So what do we do about it? ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ First, it is important to remember that there will be fightbacks. The Tory agenda of massive attacks, combined with an employers' offensive to win concessions, is going to provoke some people to fight. It is quite possible that these will be small, defensive mobilizations where people feel they have to fight because their backs are against the wall. It will be crucial to support those struggles and do everything we can to break down the wall of isolation that is likely to develop around those who try to fight. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ But secondly, it is important to think of how we can contribute to a longer-term project of rebuilding the left for future fights. It is only by rebuilding a lively, activist left from the bottom up that we can develop a base for future mobilizations and a capacity to resist waverings and sell-outs. The left will be rebuilt through activism, working together on those struggles that do develop, but also through discussion and debate. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ One of the great successes of the Harris government in Ontario has been an important shift in ideas (or "common sense"). This shift has been accomplished in concert with a variety of other governments playing more or less the same tune - ranging from the Klein Tories in Alberta to the Federal Liberals, the Parti Quebecois and, importantly, the NDP in Saskatchewan and B.C. We must not forget the crucial role of Bob Rae's NDP government in Ontario (the prequel) in establishing the idea that there is no alternative to the cuts. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ Polls show a great deal of opposition to important parts of the Tory agenda, such as cuts in health care and education and municipal restructuring. Yet there is also a creeping sense of inevitability - people often feel that there is no other choice. Tory poor-bashing has created an important change in attitudes about poverty and assistance, with a huge rise in victim-blaming. The idea that we have a basic right to housing, health care and unemployment insurance or social assistance has been badly undercut. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ This ideological shift is disorienting for a lot of people on the left. It is very important to find new ways of working together to promote discussion and debate about the right-wing agenda and how to fight it. We need an activist left, but also a left with an analysis, something to say. This requires a more open left, with more exchange and less fragmentation and recrimination. I am going to quickly raise four of the issues that the left needs to debate over the next few years. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ 1. We need to "make sense" of Harris. Much as we detest the Tories, we cannot pretend that this is just a gigantic cosmic accident, a bizarre time warp from which we will eventually emerge. The Tories are pursuing a business-driven agenda to remake government in ways that promote lean production and capitalist restructuring. Cuts in benefits and services fit with a deliberate policy of increasing the number of people (disproportionately women, immigrants, people of colour and young people) available for jobs at the lower end of the labour market: low wage, part-time and insecure jobs. There is a rough consensus among employers that they have hit on a restructuring strategy that will drive up profits. We need to understand in greater depth what they and the Tories are up to in order to equip ourselves to fight it. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ 2. We need to remember the inadequacies of the welfare state. Women, people of colour, aboriginal people immigrants, lesbians and gays and the most impoverished sections of the working class were never fully included in the welfare state. Social assistance was always inadequate and stigmatizing - it was designed to be that way! Health care services have been run by big business (such as the drug companies) and big medicine (health administrators and powerful doctors' associations). Schools were always about conformity and obedience - they just had different strategies and tactics. So let's not get all misty eyed about the golden age. The left needs to find ways to defend existing programmes against the onslaught, while at the same time raising the issue of what real social justice would look like. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ 3. We need to be very attentive to strategies of working class differentiation. Part of the strategy of capitalist restructuring is to increase the differentiation with the working class. Women are bearing the brunt of the privatization of responsibility for our well-being, as cuts in health care and social programmes dramatically increase the amount of unpaid labour around the home performed primarily by women. Some better-off workers benefit from tax cuts (and vote Tory, for example in Oshawa) while people on social assistance are driven deeper into poverty. Immigrants face head taxes and the elimination of such programmes as English as a second language, heritage education for children to learn their parents' culture and languages and various support services. More than ever, calls for "solidarity" will only be meaningful if they are met by active support of the struggles of the lower paid, people who are not employed, women and immigrants facing discrimination. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ 4. Finally, we need to engage more in the debates about how to organize the left. It is a challenge to try to build a more open left that can genuinely look to the future and learn hard lessons from the past. This is certainly a time to move beyond traditions of organizing that have led to a proliferation of small groups each claiming a monopoly on correct analysis and a broader left outside (and sometimes inside) the NDP without a real political home. It is going to take patience and creativity to build the more open left that we now need. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ The re-election of the Torieÿþs in Ontario is deeply depressing. But we can't end it there. We need to look at ways to rebuild the left through activism and discussion. One of the things we can think about is how this magazine can contribute to building a more open left. Can it become a place for some of these debates about Harris (and other neo-liberal governments) and the future of the left? How can we encourage the participation of broader layers of the left who might disagree sharply on key issues? I believe that working through these issues as well as activly supporting the small pockets of resistance that will emerge are crucial elements of the challenge we now face. ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<fontÿþ ÿþsize="1"ÿþ>ÿþAlan Sears is a member of the New Socialist Group in Windsor.ÿþ</font>ÿþ</font>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ<brÿþ>ÿþ ÿþ<formÿþ>ÿþ<inputÿþ ÿþtype="button"ÿþ ÿþvalue="Close"ÿþ ÿþonclick="top.close()"ÿþ>ÿþ</form>ÿþ ÿþ</body>ÿþ ÿþ</html>ÿþ<!-- FILE ARCHIVED ON ÿþ20:38:41 Jun 26, 2010ÿþ AND RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERNET ARCHIVE ON ÿþ10:08:51 Mar 05, 2026ÿþ. JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE. ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C. SECTION 108(a)(3)). --> <!-- ÿþplayback timings (ms): ÿþ ÿþcaptures_listÿþ: ÿþ0.578ÿþ ÿþ ÿþexclusion.robotsÿþ: ÿþ0.039ÿþ ÿþ ÿþexclusion.robots.policyÿþ: ÿþ0.03ÿþ ÿþ ÿþesindexÿþ: ÿþ0.013ÿþ ÿþ ÿþcdx.remoteÿþ: ÿþ5.65ÿþ ÿþ ÿþLoadShardBlockÿþ: ÿþ140.353ÿþ (ÿþ3ÿþ) ÿþ ÿþPetaboxLoader3.datanodeÿþ: ÿþ104.892ÿþ (ÿþ4ÿþ) ÿþ ÿþPetaboxLoader3.resolveÿþ: ÿþ105.065ÿþ (ÿþ2ÿþ) ÿþ ÿþload_resourceÿþ: ÿþ102.526ÿþ ÿþ-->