Bush II's post-September 11 words and deeds promise more wars and no peace.
More civilians have been killed in Afghanistan since September 11 than were killed in New York. Meanwhile, the US-led campaign against "rogue states" that support "terrorists" is being echoed from Israel to India, contributing to heightened tension and violence.
Despite the establishment of a new government in Kabul, the US military presence in Afghanistan has grown beyond 4,000 active troops, supported by some 750 Canadian forces serving under US command. There is no indication that the US plans to quickly end its military presence in this strategic oil-rich region.
Meanwhile, pundits speculate about the next US target in the war on terrorism, and refuse to challenge the premise that the US should freely intervene wherever it sees a security threat.
This January, Bush suggested the US military should prepare to fight new wars such as those in Afghanistan, using just-in-time intelligence, US special forces and precision high tech air strikes, and relying on local forces for most of the ground fighting.
Military threats are increasingly a political strategy and a form of psychological warfare, designed to achieve the security goals and economic agenda of the US and its allies.
George Bush,in his State of the Union address highlighted the ongoing "terrorist threat", particularly singling out the "rogue states" of Iraq,Iran and North Korea The leading targets The question is not whether war, but when and who will be the next target. There are several in line:
International opinion opposes attacking Iraq and the extremely harsh sanctions policy that has led to the death of well over a million Iraqi civilians, including some 6,000 children a month. Nor is there a Northern Alliance in place ready to do most of the fighting. For the moment, given other tensions like India-Pakistan, action is on hold. But there is little doubt Washington wants to finish the job started by Bush Senior during th 1991 Gulf War.
In January, Colombian President Andres Pastrana threatened to break off three-old-year peace talks with FARC guerrillas unless they agreed to a ceasefire. The Colombian army and paramilitaries threatened and remain poised (though the deadline is now April) to attack and occupy the Switzerland-size territory granted the FARC as part of the talks.
This would mark a sharp escalation of military conflict.The Bush administration is exploring whether it can play the FARC is terrorist card to eliminate current US Congressional restrictions on US military aid to Colombia. Colombian President is playing his part by calling for US support to fight the guerillas.
Nobody can accurately predict the future. But with threats abounding, the need to build a long-term anti-intervention, anti-war movement seems clear and urgent.